Screener
REVS vs DFAC
Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF vs Dimensional U.S. Core Equity 2 ETF
Key differences
- DFAC is significantly larger than REVS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- REVS follows a index tracking strategy; DFAC uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, DFAC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DFAC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| REVS | DFAC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.17% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $284M | $44.5B |
| Since | 2019 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.97% | 0.95% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.9% | +31.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.1% | +21.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.7% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.11 | 1.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.62% | 12.31% |
| Max drawdown | -37.85% | -23.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to REVS and DFAC
Explore further