Screener
REVS vs DFAU
Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF vs Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF
Key differences
- DFAU costs 0.07% less per year.
- DFAU is significantly larger than REVS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- REVS follows a index tracking strategy; DFAU uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, DFAU has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| REVS | DFAU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.19% | 0.12% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $284M | $11.5B |
| Since | 2019 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.97% | 0.94% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +28.9% | +31.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.1% | +22.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +11.7% | +13.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.11 | 1.18 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.62% | 12.20% |
| Max drawdown | -37.85% | -23.61% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to REVS and DFAU
Explore further