Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

REVS vs FELC

Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF vs Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF

REVS

Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF

Columbia Threadneedle

Annual cost

0.19%

Fund size

$284M

FELC

Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Core ETF

Fidelity Investments

Annual cost

0.18%

Fund size

$7.0B

Key differences

  • FELC is significantly larger than REVS — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • REVS follows a index tracking strategy; FELC uses active selection.
  • FELC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

REVSFELC
Annual cost (TER)0.19%0.18%
Fund size (AUM)$284M$7.0B
Since20192007
Dividend yield0.97%0.90%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyindex trackingactive selection
CAGR 1Y+28.9%+31.3%
CAGR 3Y+19.1%N/A
CAGR 5Y+11.7%N/A
Sharpe 3Y1.11N/A
Volatility 1Y11.62%12.05%
Max drawdown-37.85%-18.59%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to REVS and FELC