Screener
REW vs ROM
ProShares UltraShort Technology vs ProShares Ultra Technology
Key differences
- ROM is significantly larger than REW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- REW follows a inverse strategy; ROM uses leveraged.
- Over the last 3 years, ROM has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| REW | ROM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4M | $961M |
| Since | 2007 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 7.20% | 0.21% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | inverse | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -61.2% | +126.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | -46.9% | +58.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | -39.3% | +29.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -1.17 | 1.14 |
| Volatility 1Y | 41.51% | 41.23% |
| Max drawdown | -99.74% | -67.55% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to REW and ROM
Explore further