Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

ROM vs SKYU

ProShares Ultra Technology vs ProShares Ultra Cloud Computing

ROM

ProShares Ultra Technology

ProShares

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$961M

SKYU

ProShares Ultra Cloud Computing

ProShares

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$2M

Key differences

  • ROM is significantly larger than SKYU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, ROM has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • ROM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

ROMSKYU
Annual cost (TER)0.95%0.95%
Fund size (AUM)$961M$2M
Since20072021
Dividend yield0.21%0.88%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyleveragedleveraged
CAGR 1Y+126.3%+21.8%
CAGR 3Y+58.4%+38.9%
CAGR 5Y+29.7%-0.1%
Sharpe 3Y1.140.82
Volatility 1Y41.23%51.66%
Max drawdown-67.55%-83.01%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to ROM and SKYU