Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

REW vs SEF

ProShares UltraShort Technology vs ProShares Short Financials

REW

ProShares UltraShort Technology

ProShares

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$4M

SEF

ProShares Short Financials

ProShares

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$18M

Key differences

  • SEF is significantly larger than REW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, SEF has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

REWSEF
Annual cost (TER)0.95%0.95%
Fund size (AUM)$4M$18M
Since20072008
Dividend yield7.20%3.44%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyinverseinverse
CAGR 1Y-61.2%+0.0%
CAGR 3Y-46.9%-11.2%
CAGR 5Y-39.3%-6.0%
Sharpe 3Y-1.17-0.89
Volatility 1Y41.51%14.38%
Max drawdown-99.74%-75.66%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to REW and SEF