Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

REW vs SKF

ProShares UltraShort Technology vs ProShares UltraShort Financials

REW

ProShares UltraShort Technology

ProShares

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$4M

SKF

ProShares UltraShort Financials

ProShares

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$16M

Key differences

  • SKF is significantly larger than REW — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • Over the last 3 years, SKF has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

REWSKF
Annual cost (TER)0.95%0.95%
Fund size (AUM)$4M$16M
Since20072007
Dividend yield7.20%4.31%
Asset classequityequity
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyinverseinverse
CAGR 1Y-61.2%-5.0%
CAGR 3Y-46.9%-25.8%
CAGR 5Y-39.3%-16.5%
Sharpe 3Y-1.17-0.88
Volatility 1Y41.51%28.95%
Max drawdown-99.74%-96.51%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to REW and SKF