Screener
RFCI vs MANI
ALPS Dynamic Core Income ETF vs Man Active Income ETF
Key differences
RFCI is a fixed income ETF, while MANI is an alternative ETF. RFCI charges 0.51% a year and MANI 0.01%.
- RFCI is a fixed income fund, while MANI is an alternative fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- RFCI covers North America; MANI covers emerging markets.
- MANI costs 0.50% less per year.
- RFCI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RFCI | MANI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.51% | 0.01% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $16M | $20M |
| Since | 2016 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 4.53% | — |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.28 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.52% | — |
| Max drawdown | -14.52% | -0.73% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.