Screener
RFFC vs ACIO
ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF vs Aptus Collared Investment Opportunity ETF
Key differences
- RFFC costs 0.31% less per year.
- ACIO is significantly larger than RFFC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, RFFC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RFFC | ACIO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $2.3B |
| Since | 2016 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 0.74% | 0.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.1% | +17.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.9% | +16.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.6% | +10.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.24 | 1.20 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.11% | 8.40% |
| Max drawdown | -36.26% | -14.19% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RFFC and ACIO
Explore further