Screener
RFFC vs DRSK
ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF vs Aptus Defined Risk ETF
Key differences
- RFFC costs 0.30% less per year.
- DRSK is significantly larger than RFFC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RFFC is classified as equity, while DRSK is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- RFFC follows a active selection strategy; DRSK uses option income.
- Over the last 3 years, RFFC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RFFC | DRSK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.78% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $1.5B |
| Since | 2016 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.74% | 3.72% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.1% | +9.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.9% | +9.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.6% | +2.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.24 | 0.68 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.11% | 8.23% |
| Max drawdown | -36.26% | -19.87% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RFFC and DRSK
Explore further