Screener
RFFC vs BFLX
ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF vs iShares Flexible Equity Active ETF
Key differences
- BFLX costs 0.08% less per year.
- RFFC covers north america markets; BFLX covers global.
- RFFC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RFFC | BFLX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | — |
| Since | 2016 | 2026 |
| Dividend yield | 0.74% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.24 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.11% | — |
| Max drawdown | -36.26% | 0.00% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RFFC and BFLX
Explore further