Screener
RFFC vs BDYN
ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF vs iShares Dynamic Equity Active ETF
Key differences
- BDYN costs 0.08% less per year.
- BDYN is significantly larger than RFFC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RFFC is classified as equity, while BDYN is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
Side-by-side comparison
| RFFC | BDYN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $2.7B |
| Since | 2016 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.74% | 0.96% |
| Asset class | equity | mixed asset |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +30.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.8% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.23 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.09% | — |
| Max drawdown | -36.26% | -10.85% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RFFC and BDYN
Explore further