Screener
RFFC vs CPLS
ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF vs AB Core Plus Bond ETF
Key differences
- CPLS costs 0.18% less per year.
- CPLS is significantly larger than RFFC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RFFC is classified as equity, while CPLS is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- RFFC covers north america markets; CPLS covers global.
- RFFC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RFFC | CPLS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.30% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $216M |
| Since | 2016 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.74% | 4.65% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.1% | +5.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.24 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.11% | 3.91% |
| Max drawdown | -36.26% | -4.44% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RFFC and CPLS
Explore further