Screener
RFFC vs SMTH
ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF vs ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF
Key differences
- RFFC costs 0.11% less per year.
- SMTH is significantly larger than RFFC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RFFC is classified as equity, while SMTH is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- RFFC follows a active selection strategy; SMTH uses index tracking.
- RFFC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RFFC | SMTH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $2.7B |
| Since | 2016 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.74% | 4.41% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.1% | +5.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.24 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.11% | 3.95% |
| Max drawdown | -36.26% | -4.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RFFC and SMTH
Explore further