Screener
RFFC vs EZMO
ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF vs Alphadroid Broad Markets Momentum ETF
Key differences
Both RFFC and EZMO are equity ETFs. RFFC charges 0.48% a year and EZMO 0.83%. The main difference: RFFC follows a active selection strategy; EZMO uses index tracking.
- RFFC follows a active selection strategy; EZMO uses index tracking.
- RFFC costs 0.35% less per year.
- RFFC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RFFC | EZMO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.83% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $30M | $16M |
| Since | 2016 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.72% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.7% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.22 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.26% | — |
| Max drawdown | -36.26% | -11.68% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.