Screener
RFFC vs IG
ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF vs Principal Investment Grade Corporate ETF
Key differences
- IG costs 0.29% less per year.
- IG is significantly larger than RFFC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RFFC is classified as equity, while IG is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, RFFC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RFFC | IG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $179M |
| Since | 2016 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 0.74% | 5.06% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.1% | +7.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.9% | +5.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.6% | +0.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.24 | 0.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.11% | 4.81% |
| Max drawdown | -36.26% | -23.17% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RFFC and IG
Explore further