Screener
RFFC vs YLD
ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF vs Principal Active High Yield ETF
Key differences
- YLD costs 0.09% less per year.
- YLD is significantly larger than RFFC — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RFFC is classified as equity, while YLD is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- RFFC covers north america markets; YLD covers global.
- RFFC follows a active selection strategy; YLD uses multi strategy.
- Over the last 3 years, RFFC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RFFC | YLD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $524M |
| Since | 2016 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 0.74% | 7.31% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | multi strategy |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.1% | +8.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.9% | +8.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.6% | +5.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.24 | 0.90 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.11% | 4.32% |
| Max drawdown | -36.26% | -28.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RFFC and YLD
Explore further