Screener
RFFC vs MANI
ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF vs Man Active Income ETF
Key differences
- RFFC is classified as equity, while MANI is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- RFFC covers north america markets; MANI covers emerging markets.
- RFFC follows a active selection strategy; MANI uses long short.
Side-by-side comparison
| RFFC | MANI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | — |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | — |
| Since | 2016 | — |
| Dividend yield | 0.74% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | long short |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.9% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.6% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.24 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.11% | — |
| Max drawdown | -36.26% | -0.73% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RFFC and MANI
Explore further