Screener
RFFC vs RDOG
ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF vs ALPS REIT Dividend Dogs ETF
Key differences
- RDOG costs 0.13% less per year.
- RFFC follows a active selection strategy; RDOG uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, RFFC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RDOG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RFFC | RDOG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $29M | $11M |
| Since | 2016 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 0.74% | 6.31% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.1% | +24.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.9% | +13.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.6% | +3.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.24 | 0.57 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.11% | 14.70% |
| Max drawdown | -36.26% | -49.35% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RFFC and RDOG
Explore further