Screener
RFFC vs SBIO
ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF vs ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF
Key differences
Both RFFC and SBIO are equity ETFs. RFFC charges 0.48% a year and SBIO 0.50%. The main difference: RFFC follows a active selection strategy; SBIO uses index tracking.
- RFFC follows a active selection strategy; SBIO uses index tracking.
- SBIO is much larger than RFFC. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, RFFC has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RFFC | SBIO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $30M | $162M |
| Since | 2016 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 0.72% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +26.9% | +63.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.7% | +18.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.2% | +2.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.22 | 0.59 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.26% | 29.61% |
| Max drawdown | -36.26% | -63.06% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.