Screener
SBIO vs CCNR
ALPS Medical Breakthroughs ETF vs ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF
Key differences
Both SBIO and CCNR are equity ETFs. SBIO charges 0.50% a year and CCNR 0.39%. The main difference: SBIO follows a index tracking strategy; CCNR uses active selection.
- SBIO follows a index tracking strategy; CCNR uses active selection.
- SBIO covers North America; CCNR covers global markets.
- CCNR costs 0.11% less per year.
- SBIO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| SBIO | CCNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.50% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $162M | $393M |
| Since | 2014 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 2.78% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +63.4% | +60.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +18.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +2.4% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.59 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 29.61% | 18.43% |
| Max drawdown | -63.06% | -20.06% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.