Screener
SMTH vs CCNR
ALPS Smith Core Plus Bond ETF vs ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF
Key differences
- CCNR costs 0.20% less per year.
- SMTH is significantly larger than CCNR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- SMTH is classified as fixed income, while CCNR is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- SMTH covers north america markets; CCNR covers global.
- SMTH follows a index tracking strategy; CCNR uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| SMTH | CCNR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.7B | $394M |
| Since | 2023 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 4.41% | 2.77% |
| Asset class | fixed income | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.8% | +72.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 3.95% | 17.69% |
| Max drawdown | -4.10% | -20.06% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to SMTH and CCNR
Explore further