Screener
RFG vs GRPZ
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF vs Invesco S&P Smallcap 600 GARP ETF
Key differences
- RFG is significantly larger than GRPZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RFG has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RFG | GRPZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $329M | $3M |
| Since | 2006 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.34% | 0.90% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +31.2% | +25.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +19.6% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.9% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.81 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.50% | 17.82% |
| Max drawdown | -42.92% | -27.87% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RFG and GRPZ
Explore further