Screener
RFG vs PWB
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth ETF vs Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF
Key differences
- RFG costs 0.20% less per year.
- PWB is significantly larger than RFG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, PWB has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RFG | PWB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.55% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $329M | $1.9B |
| Since | 2006 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | 0.34% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.2% | +47.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.3% | +34.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.6% | +18.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.84 | 1.45 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.65% | 18.57% |
| Max drawdown | -42.92% | -32.36% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RFG and PWB
Explore further