Screener
RFV vs EQWL
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value ETF vs Invesco S&P 100 Equal Weight ETF
Key differences
- EQWL costs 0.10% less per year.
- EQWL is significantly larger than RFV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, EQWL has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RFV | EQWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $313M | $2.5B |
| Since | 2006 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.88% | 1.60% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.6% | +24.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.7% | +20.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.8% | +12.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.67 | 1.21 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.26% | 10.50% |
| Max drawdown | -52.24% | -34.30% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RFV and EQWL
Explore further