Screener
RFV vs RSP
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
Key differences
- RSP costs 0.15% less per year.
- RSP is significantly larger than RFV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RFV follows a index tracking strategy; RSP uses index enhanced.
- Over the last 3 years, RFV has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RFV | RSP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.20% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $313M | $86.4B |
| Since | 2006 | 2003 |
| Dividend yield | 1.88% | 1.53% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.6% | +21.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.7% | +15.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.8% | +8.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.67 | 0.83 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.26% | 11.72% |
| Max drawdown | -52.24% | -39.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RFV and RSP
Explore further