Screener
RFV vs OMFS
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value ETF vs Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Key differences
- RFV follows a index tracking strategy; OMFS uses index enhanced.
- RFV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RFV | OMFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $313M | $275M |
| Since | 2006 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.88% | 0.93% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.6% | +33.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.7% | +15.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.8% | +6.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.67 | 0.65 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.26% | 17.69% |
| Max drawdown | -52.24% | -42.50% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RFV and OMFS
Explore further