Screener
RFV vs PKW
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value ETF vs Invesco BuyBack Achievers ETF
Key differences
- RFV costs 0.27% less per year.
- PKW is significantly larger than RFV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, PKW has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RFV | PKW | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.62% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $313M | $1.6B |
| Since | 2006 | 2006 |
| Dividend yield | 1.88% | 0.89% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.6% | +18.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.7% | +18.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.8% | +10.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.67 | 0.94 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.26% | 13.30% |
| Max drawdown | -52.24% | -40.93% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RFV and PKW
Explore further