Screener
RFV vs PSCF
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value ETF vs Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF
Key differences
- PSCF costs 0.06% less per year.
- RFV is significantly larger than PSCF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, PSCF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RFV | PSCF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $313M | $25M |
| Since | 2006 | 2010 |
| Dividend yield | 1.88% | 2.34% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +24.6% | +22.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +16.7% | +18.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.8% | +4.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.67 | 0.73 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.26% | 17.57% |
| Max drawdown | -52.24% | -45.46% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RFV and PSCF
Explore further