Screener
RFV vs QVMS
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value ETF vs Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF
Key differences
- QVMS costs 0.20% less per year.
- RFV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RFV | QVMS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $313M | $232M |
| Since | 2006 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.88% | 1.15% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.6% | +32.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.7% | +15.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.63 | 0.65 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.24% | 17.73% |
| Max drawdown | -52.24% | -28.05% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RFV and QVMS
Explore further