Screener
RFV vs QVML
Invesco S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value ETF vs Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF
Key differences
- QVML costs 0.24% less per year.
- QVML is significantly larger than RFV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, QVML has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RFV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RFV | QVML | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.11% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $313M | $1.6B |
| Since | 2006 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | 1.88% | 1.04% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +23.6% | +28.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.7% | +22.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +9.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.63 | 1.22 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.24% | 11.85% |
| Max drawdown | -52.24% | -23.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RFV and QVML
Explore further