Screener
RGLO vs FENI
Russell Investments Global Equity ETF vs Fidelity Enhanced International ETF
Key differences
- FENI costs 0.21% less per year.
- FENI is significantly larger than RGLO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RGLO covers north america markets; FENI covers europe.
- RGLO follows a index tracking strategy; FENI uses active selection.
- FENI has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RGLO | FENI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.28% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $309M | $9.1B |
| Since | 2025 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.93% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | europe |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +29.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.63% |
| Max drawdown | -9.61% | -14.20% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RGLO and FENI
Explore further