Screener
RGLO vs GEM
Russell Investments Global Equity ETF vs Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta Emerging Markets Equity ETF
Key differences
- GEM costs 0.14% less per year.
- GEM is significantly larger than RGLO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RGLO covers north america markets; GEM covers emerging markets.
- RGLO follows a index tracking strategy; GEM uses index enhanced.
- GEM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RGLO | GEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $309M | $1.5B |
| Since | 2025 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.03% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +50.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +23.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.09 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 19.41% |
| Max drawdown | -9.61% | -37.02% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RGLO and GEM
Explore further