Screener
RGLO vs ROBO
Russell Investments Global Equity ETF vs Robo Global Robotics and Automation Index ETF
Key differences
- RGLO costs 0.46% less per year.
- ROBO is significantly larger than RGLO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RGLO covers north america markets; ROBO covers global.
- RGLO follows a index tracking strategy; ROBO uses active selection.
- ROBO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RGLO | ROBO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $309M | $1.8B |
| Since | 2025 | 2013 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.36% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +57.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +17.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.69 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 22.95% |
| Max drawdown | -9.61% | -43.65% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RGLO and ROBO
Explore further