Screener
RHRX vs FOPC
RH Tactical Rotation ETF vs Frontier Asset Opportunistic Credit ETF
Key differences
RHRX is an alternative ETF, while FOPC is a fixed income ETF. RHRX charges 1.38% a year and FOPC 0.87%.
- RHRX is an alternative fund, while FOPC is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
- RHRX follows a option income strategy; FOPC uses active selection.
- FOPC costs 0.51% less per year.
- RHRX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RHRX | FOPC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.38% | 0.87% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $36M | $34M |
| Since | 2012 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 4.26% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +36.9% | +4.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.4% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.08 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.75% | 2.87% |
| Max drawdown | -25.33% | -2.18% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.