Skip to content
Screener

RHRX vs ZHOG

RH Tactical Rotation ETF vs F/m Opportunistic Income ETF

RHRX

RH Tactical Rotation ETF

Annual cost

1.38%

Fund size

$36M

ZHOG

F/m Opportunistic Income ETF

Annual cost

0.43%

Fund size

$46M

Key differences

RHRX is an alternative ETF, while ZHOG is a fixed income ETF. RHRX charges 1.38% a year and ZHOG 0.43%.

  • RHRX is an alternative fund, while ZHOG is a fixed income fund. They carry different risk/return profiles.
  • RHRX follows a option income strategy; ZHOG uses active selection.
  • ZHOG costs 0.95% less per year.
  • RHRX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

RHRXZHOG
Annual cost (TER)1.38%0.43%
Fund size (AUM)$36M$46M
Since20122023
Dividend yield0.00%5.61%
Asset classalternativefixed income
Regionnorth americanorth america
Strategyoption incomeactive selection
CAGR 1Y+36.9%+5.3%
CAGR 3Y+22.4%N/A
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y1.08N/A
Volatility 1Y13.75%1.58%
Max drawdown-25.33%-3.66%

Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.

See all income funds

Similar to RHRX and ZHOG