Screener
RHRX vs TUGN
RH Tactical Rotation ETF vs STF Tactical Growth & Income ETF
Key differences
- TUGN costs 0.73% less per year.
- Over the last 3 years, TUGN has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RHRX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RHRX | TUGN | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 1.38% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $34M | $78M |
| Since | 2012 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.00% | 11.46% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | option income | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.5% | +35.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.4% | +24.2% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.09 | 1.10 |
| Volatility 1Y | 13.26% | 15.35% |
| Max drawdown | -25.33% | -23.45% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RHRX and TUGN
Explore further