Screener
RIFR vs CTEC
Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF vs Global X ClimateTech ETF
Key differences
- CTEC costs 0.09% less per year.
- RIFR follows a active selection strategy; CTEC uses index tracking.
- CTEC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RIFR | CTEC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $42M | $30M |
| Since | 2025 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.59% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.0% | +124.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +1.3% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -2.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.11 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.46% | 34.99% |
| Max drawdown | -6.80% | -81.58% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RIFR and CTEC
Explore further