Screener
RIFR vs IFGL
Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF vs iShares International Developed Real Estate ETF
Key differences
- IFGL costs 0.11% less per year.
- RIFR follows a active selection strategy; IFGL uses index tracking.
- IFGL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RIFR | IFGL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.48% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $42M | $88M |
| Since | 2025 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | — | 3.68% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.1% | +11.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +7.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -1.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.32 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.40% | 13.68% |
| Max drawdown | -6.80% | -40.38% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RIFR and IFGL
Explore further