Screener
RIFR vs REET
Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF vs iShares Global REIT ETF
Key differences
- REET costs 0.45% less per year.
- REET is significantly larger than RIFR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RIFR follows a active selection strategy; REET uses index tracking.
- REET has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RIFR | REET | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.14% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $42M | $4.8B |
| Since | 2025 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | — | 3.36% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.1% | +17.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +10.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.51 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.40% | 12.05% |
| Max drawdown | -6.80% | -44.59% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RIFR and REET
Explore further