Screener
RIFR vs IGLB
Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF vs iShares 10+ Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- IGLB costs 0.55% less per year.
- IGLB is significantly larger than RIFR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RIFR is classified as equity, while IGLB is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- RIFR covers global markets; IGLB covers north america.
- RIFR follows a active selection strategy; IGLB uses index tracking.
- IGLB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RIFR | IGLB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.04% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $42M | $2.7B |
| Since | 2025 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | — | 5.28% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.1% | +9.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +5.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -1.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.18 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.40% | 8.01% |
| Max drawdown | -6.80% | -34.12% |
Similar to RIFR and IGLB
Explore further