Screener
RIFR vs IGRO
Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF vs iShares International Dividend Growth ETF
Key differences
- IGRO costs 0.44% less per year.
- IGRO is significantly larger than RIFR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RIFR follows a active selection strategy; IGRO uses index tracking.
- IGRO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RIFR | IGRO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $42M | $1.2B |
| Since | 2025 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.39% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.1% | +16.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +15.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.89 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.40% | 12.51% |
| Max drawdown | -6.80% | -36.25% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RIFR and IGRO
Explore further