Screener
IGRO vs IGF
iShares International Dividend Growth ETF vs iShares Global Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- IGRO costs 0.24% less per year.
- IGF is significantly larger than IGRO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- IGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| IGRO | IGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.15% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.2B | $10.7B |
| Since | 2016 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 2.39% | 2.89% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.6% | +18.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +15.4% | +15.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.1% | +10.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.89 | 0.94 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.51% | 10.40% |
| Max drawdown | -36.25% | -42.11% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to IGRO and IGF
Explore further