Screener
RIFR vs PIO
Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF vs Invesco Global Water ETF
Key differences
- RIFR costs 0.16% less per year.
- PIO is significantly larger than RIFR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RIFR follows a active selection strategy; PIO uses index tracking.
- PIO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RIFR | PIO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.75% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $42M | $281M |
| Since | 2025 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.97% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.1% | +4.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +8.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +3.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.39 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.40% | 14.70% |
| Max drawdown | -6.80% | -35.76% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RIFR and PIO
Explore further