Screener
RIFR vs PHO
Russell Investments Global Infrastructure ETF vs Invesco Water Resources ETF
Key differences
- PHO is significantly larger than RIFR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RIFR covers global markets; PHO covers north america.
- RIFR follows a active selection strategy; PHO uses index tracking.
- PHO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RIFR | PHO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.59% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $42M | $2.1B |
| Since | 2025 | 2005 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.56% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | global | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +16.1% | -1.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +7.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +5.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.33 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.40% | 15.23% |
| Max drawdown | -6.80% | -34.92% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RIFR and PHO
Explore further