Screener
RINF vs LQDI
ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF vs iShares Inflation Hedged Corporate Bond ETF
Key differences
- LQDI costs 0.12% less per year.
- LQDI is significantly larger than RINF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RINF is classified as fixed income, while LQDI is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- Over the last 3 years, LQDI has delivered higher annualized returns.
- RINF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RINF | LQDI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.30% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $18M | $70M |
| Since | 2012 | 2018 |
| Dividend yield | 3.74% | 4.56% |
| Asset class | fixed income | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +2.4% | +7.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.7% | +5.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +5.0% | +1.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.19 | 0.36 |
| Volatility 1Y | 4.58% | 5.00% |
| Max drawdown | -29.18% | -28.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RINF and LQDI
Explore further