Screener
RING vs SGDM
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF vs Sprott Gold Miners ETF
Key differences
- RING costs 0.07% less per year.
- RING is significantly larger than SGDM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- RING follows a index tracking strategy; SGDM uses active selection.
- Over the last 3 years, RING has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RING | SGDM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.46% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.9B | $660M |
| Since | 2012 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 0.80% | 1.01% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +77.4% | +66.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +46.5% | +38.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | +19.8% | +18.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.11 | 0.97 |
| Volatility 1Y | 46.02% | 44.78% |
| Max drawdown | -52.04% | -49.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RING and SGDM
Explore further