Screener
RING vs SLVP
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF vs iShares MSCI Global Silver and Metals Miners ETF
Key differences
- RING is significantly larger than SLVP — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, SLVP has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RING | SLVP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.39% | 0.39% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.9B | $945M |
| Since | 2012 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 0.80% | 1.72% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +80.5% | +129.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +45.2% | +50.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +19.4% | +16.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.09 | 1.06 |
| Volatility 1Y | 45.82% | 52.87% |
| Max drawdown | -52.04% | -62.04% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RING and SLVP
Explore further