Screener
RINT vs EFA
Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF vs iShares MSCI EAFE ETF
Key differences
- EFA costs 0.17% less per year.
- EFA is significantly larger than RINT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EFA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| RINT | EFA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.49% | 0.32% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $131M | $75.6B |
| Since | 2025 | 2001 |
| Dividend yield | — | 3.17% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +22.9% | +22.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.82 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.85% | 15.12% |
| Max drawdown | -11.91% | -34.19% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RINT and EFA
Explore further