Screener
RISN vs BLES
Inspire Capital Appreciation ETF vs Inspire Global Hope ETF
Key differences
- BLES costs 0.12% less per year.
- RISN is classified as mixed asset, while BLES is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- RISN covers north america markets; BLES covers global.
- RISN follows a active selection strategy; BLES uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, BLES has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| RISN | BLES | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.72% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $85M | $146M |
| Since | 2020 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 1.06% | 1.81% |
| Asset class | mixed asset | equity |
| Region | north america | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +14.9% | +24.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +11.5% | +16.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.7% | +8.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.64 | 0.86 |
| Volatility 1Y | 12.03% | 12.49% |
| Max drawdown | -21.88% | -40.35% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to RISN and BLES
Explore further